Search for: "The People v. Rogers"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,296
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2021, 4:57 am
The number one issue that Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers raised on the last day of the recent Epic Games v. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:21 am
But faced with the choice, I clearly prefer Android because Apple is too heavy-handed.The Epic Games v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:06 am
We aim to hold the health care industry accountable for ignoring peoples’ rights to access their medical records and those of their kids. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 12:45 pm
In Brnovich v. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 6:20 am
” People v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Janus didn't discuss Turner or PruneYard, and mentioned Rumsfeld only for the narrow proposition that "government may not 'impose penalties or withhold benefits based on membership in a disfavored group' where doing so 'ma[kes] group membership less attractive.'"[134] And the compelled contribution cases, of which Janus is the most recent, have drawn a line between compelling people to fund the views expressed by a particular private speaker (such as the… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Douglass’s aggressively textualist anti-slavery reading of the Constitution is riveting when read just a few pages after Roger Taney’s extra-textual Dred Scott decision. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:41 am
They were debating whether much of the Supreme Court case of Dred Scott v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:47 am
The judge, Roger T. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 9:15 am
What We Learned From the Epic Games v. [read post]
22 May 2021, 7:12 am
No, I don't want to gloat, but it's mind-boggling what happened yesterday in that Oakland courtroom at the end of the main part (they're done apart from closing arguments on Monday) of the Epic Games v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 8:58 am
In 1981, in Rogers v. [read post]
16 May 2021, 7:59 am
Blechman Blechman v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:51 am
District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers’ comments came during the examination of Apple Inc. [read post]
6 May 2021, 10:05 pm
The CDC says that fully vaccinated people can "[v]isit with other fully vaccinated people indoors without wearing masks or physical distancing. [read post]
1 May 2021, 7:19 am
Despite most headlines describing them as a tax on “Big Tech”, it’s the little guys that end up paying. pic.twitter.com/jWQJ0VFsX4— Tim Bradshaw (@tim) September 1, 2020 At around the same time, other people commented on it as well, and one website had to backtrack because they might it sound like Apple passed 100% of those digital services taxes on to developers. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 6:30 am
Chief Justice Roger Taney wrote the Southern interpretation into the Constitution in the Dred Scott v. [read post]
