Search for: "The People v. Stephen Price" Results 181 - 200 of 281
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2012, 1:37 pm by Peter Rost
"Ahead of these give-backs, they dramatically raise prices," Dr. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 SillyBandz: another kind of bracelet at a different price point. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
David Price Solicitors & Advocates acted for the defendant, which publicly apologised to the Claimant. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
  A snapshot of recent cases, for example, shows that £10,000 can easily be incurred by one party just to get to strike out or summary judgement (see reports on Lait v Evening Standard, Kordowski v Hudson, Robins v Kordowski) – and for some cases this incredibly conservative (Apsion v Butler). [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:43 am by Anita Davies
Hearing arguments on the Stolen Valor Act, the justices discussed wartime bravery, high school diplomas and lies people tell on dates. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:42 am by Peter Rost
"Ahead of these give-backs, they dramatically raise prices," Dr. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
There is also a Press Release and an Apology. 9.3.11   SIOC/11/0288 The Right Honourable Sir Stephen Sedley v Telegraph Media Group. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
The Kyiv Post was successful in a “libel tourism” case brought by businessman Dimitry Firtash in respect of a story downloaded by 21 people in England. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:11 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
They asked the Delaware Chancery Court to review the “entire fairness” of the transaction, per Kahn v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
First, there was the judgment of Mr Justice Tugendhat in the case of Andre v Price [2010] EWHC 2572 (QB) – given on 11 October 2010. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
“Mr Andre accepted a public apology from Ms Price at the High Court in London”. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The Daily Mail’s counsel, Jonathan Caplan, argued that the paper’s data requests outlined in the ‘What Price Privacy Now‘ report (2006) were legal. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
The witnesses were Jack Straw MP, Lord Wakeham, Sir Stephen Sedley, and Professor Gavin Phillipson. [read post]