Search for: "The Southwark" Results 181 - 200 of 471
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2014, 12:00 am by Darryl Hutcheon, Matrix
This week, the Supreme Court hears the appeal in Hotak v London Borough of Southwark, which is joined with the appeals in Johnson v Solihull and Kanu v Southwark. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:11 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On Monday 15 December 2014 the Court will hear the joined appeals of Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark involving what the correct test should be when trying to establish if a person should have priority need status for the purposes of the Housing Act 1996, s19, in particular how to determine whether they were “vulnerable”. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 2:15 pm by Giles Peaker
When they do so, it is usually, as here, as a result of honest misjudgement and scarcely ever (although it was found to have occurred in AA v London Borough of Southwark [2014] EWHC 500 (QB)[our note]) as a result of any deliberate intention to act unlawfully. the Court later added Parliament might wish to revisit the application of section 27, and therefore of section 28, of the 1988 Act to unlawful evictions on the part of local authorities. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 3:29 pm by Giles Peaker
Rather unusually, faced with one of the most coruscating High Court judgments I can recall, in AA V LB Southwark [our report here], the senior officers of Southwark Council have chosen to do neither. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 8:06 am by Giles Peaker
In that case, Southwark had issued 5 claims over 8 years, each on the same ground and each failing for the same specific reason, which they did not correct. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:45 pm by Giles Peaker
Mr AA was Southwark’s secure tenant. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 3:21 am by Tessa Shepperson
 All will be revealed here …   Further reading Southwark Council criticised for unfairly evicting a tenant and destroying all his possessions Trading Standards are checking up on agents to see if they belong to a redress scheme MPs want changes for renting for the under 35s The Guardian says that affordable homes have dropped by 26% Keep up with the news with me on twitter, Google+ and the Landlord Law Facebook page >> Click here  to get the weekly… [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:29 am by Tessa Shepperson
The criminal court shat on Southwark council and every council tax payer in that borough…..and I am one of them. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 11:48 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
We have been onto their agents, saying get it sorted or we will report a 215 to Southwark council AND their owner clients who are paying them 10%. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 1:57 pm by S
In Kanu v Southwark LBC [2014] EWCA Civ 1085, the Court of Appeal considered whether the public sector equality duty added an additional obligation on housing officers when they came to consider whether an applicant had a priority need. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:36 pm by Giles Peaker
They are not the only London council to consider five years residence requirement – so are LB Southwark – but their stated reason for the increase is specifically because: Increased costs in inner London combined with restrictions on housing benefit has resulted in more households moving to outer London boroughs like Barnet. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 4:30 am by INFORRM
” Such a pity that YATES wasn’t aware of accusations made at Southwark Crown Court only a week before. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:06 pm by Giles Peaker
 Ms Y had applied to Southwark as homeless in February 2012 and Southwark had accepted that she was eligible and owed the housing duty. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 11:09 am by Giles Peaker
Southwark argued that wet plaster was not disrepair, relying on Post Office Properties v Aquarius Ltd [1987] 1 All ER 1055 CA. [read post]
15 May 2014, 3:52 pm by Giles Peaker
Southwark – [Decision notice] Couple unable to share bedroom by reason of disability, argued as Art 14 discrimination. [read post]
1 May 2014, 6:12 am by Steve Cornforth
Legal Aid was only granted following the threat of Judicial Review Proceedings against the Legal Aid Agency.http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/law/legal-aid-ruling-saves-rape-victim-from-court-trauma/5040839.articleBut the most embarrassing moment for the government has to be the Crown Court decision in Southwark today. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 5:54 am by Giles Peaker
Southwark applied for a wasted costs order against Gans & Co. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 5:54 am by Giles Peaker
Southwark applied for a wasted costs order against Gans & Co. [read post]