Search for: "Thomas v. Georgia"
Results 181 - 200
of 860
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2021, 1:28 pm
On February 10, in Hamen v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[24] Courts in Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia do not enforce Type II agreements and only enforce Type I agreements.[25] Other jurisdictions enforce both Type I and Type II agreements as binding. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm
United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:46 pm
The question before the court on Tuesday in Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 11:10 am
Boockvar and Scarnati v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 9:00 am
The issue comes to the justices in Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 6:43 am
Worcester v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:40 am
See Trump v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Thomas C. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 12:13 pm
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:08 am
Now what about Texas v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 6:34 pm
Georgia: In Boland v. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 5:04 am
The US Supreme Court late Friday denied the motion for leave to file a complaint in Texas v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:07 pm
Georgia, for example, claims in its filing that "Texas seeks to alter how Georgia appoints it electors" (Brief in Opposition, at page 12). [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:50 pm
Justice Samuel Alito filed a short statement regarding the court’s disposition of the case that was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 3:38 pm
See Arizona v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:40 am
In Georgia, it was illegal to relax signature verification rules. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
Georgia, for example, claims in its filing that "Texas seeks to alter how Georgia appoints it electors" (Brief in Opposition, at page 12). [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 1:28 pm
See Bush, 531 U.S. at 112 (Rehnquist, C.J., concurring, with Scalia, J. and Thomas, J.) [read post]
