Search for: "Thomas v. Social Security Administration" Results 181 - 200 of 376
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The second episode of Media Law Podcast has a debate between Dr Thomas Bennett and Dr Paul Wragg under the title “Invasion of Privacy – What’s the harm? [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:49 pm by Amy Howe
The Social Security Administration’s “Appeals Council” reviews appeals from administrative decisions by individuals seeking disability benefits. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
They could frustrate government responses to social problems in a way not seen in America since the Great Depression. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
Justice Antonin Scalia was the most outspoken proponent of this view, but Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch also generally adhere to it. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 12:29 pm by Amy Howe
” The party had argued that the act requires states to successfully match voters with computer records in the state’s driver’s license database or the Social Security database before they could register to vote or have their votes counted. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:55 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, and Judge Thomas Hardiman of the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:25 am by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court agreed to hear a case that could resolve a split among federal appellate courts about the evidentiary basis required to deny social security disability benefits due to “other work” available to the applicant. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The more interesting questions are why they did so and why this odd little case saw the return of the usual ideological split among the justices.The tax aspect of the case arises from the Railroad Retirement Tax Act of 1937, which created a retirement system for railroad workers that was separate from the just-enacted Social Security system. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:57 am by Alan Morrison
  Most of the federal ALJs sit on Social Security Administration cases (over 1,650 out of 1,926), for which it is much less likely that appointments clause objections were preserved, but given the number of cases they have, even a relative few will be bad news for the agency. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm by Peter Shane
Securities and Exchange Commission, along with its other much-anticipated decisions, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:54 am by Ronald Mann
It is plain from the briefing that the great majority of those judges are in the Social Security Administration, though a substantial number of ALJs are scattered throughout other departments. [read post]