Search for: "Three S Consulting v. US"
Results 181 - 200
of 5,364
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
In Anderson v Anderson, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2023 WL 8246131, 2023 N.Y. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:36 am
None of us likes to think about our own death or enjoys planning for that occasion. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:24 pm
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: Jessica McGaw v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 9:00 am
Here is a PDF copy of the decision: Geiger v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:35 am
Issuers will have a three-year transition period in which to comply, meaning that issuers must appoint a director of a different gender (to the majority of the board) by no later than 31 December 2024. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:03 am
Boyko v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
This groundbreaking concept of systemizing and optimizing a firm’s approach to non-hourly pricing through the use of a purpose-built software tool is an incredibly substantial innovation in the legal pricing space. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:58 am
Last month, in Flor v Greenberg Farrow Architectural Inc., a three-judge panel of the New Jersey Appellate Division handed down an opinion with important lessons for business owners and practitioners in states that have adopted the Revised Uniform LLC Act, such as New Jersey, as well as in states that haven’t, such as New York. [read post]
Misconduct by Officers Executing Process (s. 128) Charges in Canada: Offences, Defences, Punishments
1 Dec 2023, 12:46 pm
For example, in R v Hok, the officer was arresting someone without the use of force, which did not qualify as misconduct based on the officer’s organizational standards. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
A report by historic building consultants supported the proposal. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
The off-channel communications actions were also significant in that the respondents agreed to retain independent compliance consultants and undertake comprehensive reviews of their internal policies and procedures. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm
Gale, P.A. is for informational purposes only and is intended to be used as a non-legal guide prior to consultation with an attorney familiar with your specific legal situation. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 7:17 am
Haney v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:34 am
For interested readers, here are links to recent articles on Ng v Asquared and O’Mahony v Whiston. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
United States, both concern the term "serious drug offense" as used in the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 11:08 am
As noted below, the new law will only require that the contract set forth each party’s “mailing address,” not where the services are to be performed or where the services will be used. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 8:58 am
It has now been over three months since the Consumer Duty has come into force and we have seen recent related enforcement activity and expect more to come. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 1:42 pm
To find out more, call us today at (727) 286-6141 to schedule your free initial consultation. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
[v] Both Canada[vi] and New Zealand[vii] quickly claimed victory. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Donell v. [read post]
