Search for: "U S A Truck Inc"
Results 181 - 193
of 193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2008, 10:28 pm
Elrac Inc., U-Haul Co., Inc. decided August 5, 2008, The First Department reversed the order of the Supreme Court granting U-Haul's motion for summary judgment and granted plaintiffs cross motion to amend his Complaint and held the amendment related back to the original date of filing of the initial complaint thus avoiding application of The Graves Amendment. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:12 am
On July 29, 2005, Tirado filed a verified complaint against the driver of the rental car, Elrac, the driver of the rental truck, and U-Haul, Inc (UHI). [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
Superior Vending, LLC, 2008 NY Slip Op 51205(U) (June 6, 2008). [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 8:12 pm
See Bill Johnson's Rests., Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 4:07 am
Medtronic, Inc., 1128 S. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 5:57 pm
Pazzo's Bar and Eatery, Inc. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
U-Haul Co. of California (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 796, 802 803 [plaintiff alleged he was required to purchase excess fuel when returning rental truck]; Monarch Plumbing Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 4:31 am
U-Haul Intern., Inc. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 8:39 am
S. 384 (1964) (per curiam), and Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:12 pm
Can-Am Plumbing, Inc. (32-CA-16097; 350 NLRB No. 75) Pleasanton, CA Aug. 24, 2007. [read post]
18 May 2007, 6:00 am
U-Haul Co. of California (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 796, 802-803 [plaintiff alleged he was required to purchase excess fuel when returning rental truck]; Monarch Plumbing Co. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 6:00 am
" (Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. [read post]
