Search for: "U. S. v. Burns" Results 181 - 200 of 201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2008, 2:27 pm
In fact, the issue was of such concern that baseball’s Safety and Health Advisory Committee was convened to study the problem and issue recommendations, including, if deemed appropriate, banning the use of maple bats. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
Despite the Supreme Court's 1976 ruling in Gregg v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:11 pm
S., at ___ (slip op., at 11), there is no longer a limit comparable to the one at issue in Burns on the variances from Guidelines ranges that a District Court may find justified under the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 11:20 pm
Mehta sued OU for defamation, and his four-day trial ended Thursday.Attorney-client privilege was waived so that Burns could testify on the university's behalf. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:36 pm
I would be careful not to burn my bridge with my old lawyer before I knew whether I could get a new one. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:25 pm
" KSR's brief never cited In re Kotzab, 217 F.3d 1365, or Ruiz v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:18 pm
Under your misguided and bizarre reading of the statue, if a magazine published a photo of a woman hitting her child, every singe citizen who saw the photo and didn't call authorities would be criminally liable, as would anyone who viewed a U-tube video of random kids playing unsafely. [read post]