Search for: "U. S. v. Miller"
Results 181 - 200
of 411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
thee with much cherishing, thou eight relisted Miller retroactivity cases, with records received, waiting to learn whether, after between five and six relists each, and many brethren remanded, their outcomes will be changed soon by Montgomery v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am
Louisiana, which held that 2012’s Miller v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 2:52 pm
(See Eric’s post on Miller v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:07 am
Louisiana, addressing the retroactivity of its decision in Miller v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 6:01 am
In the Miller v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:48 pm
Nothing much happened until 2012, in Miller v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s explanation (deriving from Martin v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 7:00 pm
Montgomery gives retrospective effect to Miller v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 1:48 pm
Last year, in Miller v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 3:48 pm
Center For Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:33 am
Miller, Morning Mix) reports, “Video shows U. of Missouri protesters and professor barring media coverage. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am
Louisiana, 14-280, the case asking whether Miller v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
Virginia 14-1248Issue: (1) Whether the claimed authority of a trial court to suspend a statutorily-prescribed sentence of life without parole for a juvenile offender ensures the proportionality required by the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment; and (2) whether the Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
While Public Resources Code § 21061 – a general definitional statute not cited by OPR in support of its proposal – defines an EIR as “a detailed statement setting forth the matters specified in Sections 21100 and 21100.1[,]” this general reference is of unclear import and per CEQA’s own terms governs “[u]nless the context otherwise requires. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
The conflicts are most acute when one country’s legal prohibitions on producing data in response to surveillance directives cannot be squared with another country’s legal compulsions to do so. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
The Supreme Court's ruling in Royston v Lopez sends a message encouraging Texas lawyers and lawfirms to do just that. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:41 am
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:21 pm
Miller, Esq., New York, NY. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
His concurring opinion does not question, or even cite, Smith, Miller, or the third-party doctrine in any way. [read post]
