Search for: "U. S. v. Sam*"
Results 181 - 200
of 4,659
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2023, 6:14 am
In Mrkulic v Peters 2023 NY Slip Op 33930(U) November 2, 2023Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 505025/2020Judge Debra Silber points out a vast number of errors that took place before she was assigned to the case. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Gastiaburo, 16 F.3d 582, 586 (4th Cir. 1994) (stating that “[u]nder the Supreme Court’s precedents, the fact that impoundment may have made it virtually impossible for anyone to drive the car away or to tamper with its contents is irrelevant to the constitutionality of a warrantless search . . . . [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm
U. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
App. 2018) (an armed robber inadvertently left his phone in victim’s car, thereby abandoning it, citing Edwards v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 12:11 pm
See United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 1:24 pm
” But then in Food Marketing Institute v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 11:39 am
Lindke v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:57 am
Mensch v Calogero 2023 NY Slip Op 33648(U) October 17, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155795/2022Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
(b) Promoting responsible innovation, competition, and collaboration will allow the United States to lead in AI and unlock the technology’s potential to solve some of society’s most difficult challenges. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division then held that "the repeal of Civil Rights Law §50-a applies retroactively to records created prior to June 12, 2020", citing Schenectady Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Schenectady, 2020 WL 7978093; 2020 NY Slip Op 34346[U]. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division then held that "the repeal of Civil Rights Law §50-a applies retroactively to records created prior to June 12, 2020", citing Schenectady Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Schenectady, 2020 WL 7978093; 2020 NY Slip Op 34346[U]. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:10 pm
The saga between Apple and Corephotonics continues in Corephotonics, Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm
In 1969, however, the statute was amended to protect an artist’s interest in the proceeds from the sale of the artist’s art in addition to the artist’s interests in the art itself. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:10 am
” Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:19 am
He said that the lack of comparative precedent weakens Chevron’s foundations in and of itself. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 6:34 pm
Human Factors/Usability (HF/U) and Clinical Performance Testing The draft guidance offers general information about HF/U and clinical performance testing. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 5:40 am
” It proceeded from there to breadth, noting that, “[u]nder the Government’s reading of the” statute, “the Secretary would enjoy virtually unlimited power to rewrite the Education Act. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Jackson Women's Health Organization: Revisiting the Fourteenth Amendment, Due Process of Law, and American Citizenship, (Ohio Northern University Law Review, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2023).Carmel Shachar & Carleen Zubrzycki, Informational Privacy After Dobbs, (Alabama Law Review, Forthcoming).Hillary Schneller, Diana Kasdan, Risa Kaufman & Alex Wilson, Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Robbins, and Kisor v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:27 am
Supreme Court granted a property owner’s petition for writ of certiorari in Sheetz v. [read post]
