Search for: "U. S. v. Sellers" Results 181 - 200 of 223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2013, 5:09 am by Peter Mahler
Sara’s New York Homestay, LLC, 2013 NY Slip Op 31719(U) (Sup Ct NY County July 25, 2013). [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:46 am by Peter Mahler
Now there’s a fourth, Bak v Rostek, 2020 NY Slip Op 33142(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Sept. 25, 2020], in which a 47.5% member of a single-asset realty-holding LLC sold his membership interest to the other 52.5% member for around $900,000 based on a $1.9 million valuation assigned by the buying member. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
  As the UK’s Serious Organized Crime Agency warned advertisers, “By incorporating advertising from recognized brands the website administrator attempt[s] to make the site appear legitimate. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Us registration for THE for clothing and other merchandise by putting THE on a hangtag. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court also held that the law, which limited itself to ads for handguns, and only those that were on store premises, was unconstitutionally underinclusive: "[U]nderinclusivity is relevant to Central Hudson's direct advancement prong because it 'may diminish the credibility of the government's rationale for restricting speech in the first place.'" For example, in Pitt News v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 3:24 am
Assumable mortgage: a mortgage that can be transferred from a seller to a buyer; once the loan is assumed by the buyer the seller is no longer responsible for repaying it; there may be a fee and/or a credit package involved in the transfer of an assumable mortgage. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 4:19 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Pappas v B & G Holding Co. (2024 NY Slip Op 51218(U) [Sup Ct, Bronx County Sept. 6, 2024]), was reminiscent of the Worbes case I blogged about and then substituted in as counsel helping to bring the case to a successful conclusion – but with the parties’ roles reversed. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am by admin
”   Florida Crystals [U S Sugar's biggest competitor – Ed.] labeled the deal a taxpayer-supported buyout of United States Sugar, and seemed to be smarting from being left out of it. [read post]