Search for: "U. S. v. Sport"
Results 181 - 200
of 250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am
At the Penn Journal on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Sarah Paoletti maintains that “[d]ue to th[is term’s] ruling [in Jennings v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 11:55 am
” Judge Leon then laid out the government’s theory of market harm from a merger: that when Time Warner negotiates with rivals of AT&T’s MVPDs (DirecTV, DirecTVNow and AT&T U-Verse), it would have anti-competitive leverage over the rivals allowing it to either charge supra-competitive rates or to withhold the programming from the rivals entirely. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 6:21 pm
Sports & Ent. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
(Public Knowledge) US Copyright – Decisions S D Ohio: RIAA’s need for discovery was not so urgent: Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Sports & Ent. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:39 pm
Miami Entertainment & Sports L. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm
The Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Jeremy Wright also announced that the UK will set up a National Committee for the Safety of Journalists. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 1:42 pm
One of the lead writers on the Deadspin sports website, Will Leitch, wrote a lovely column about how much he owed to Ebert, who taught him in a class at U. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
Internet and Social Media In the case of UFC-Que Choisir v Google (Judgment in French) the TGI Paris has ruled that 38 of the clauses in Google’s “Terms of use” and “Confidentiality Policy” were unfair and hence null and void. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
11 U. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 8:58 am
U. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
V. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
How sporting. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 6:00 am
Rebkee, the U. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
Sports Illustrated’s Sports Century – A Warrior’s Heart, Dan Gable – Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
While Public Resources Code § 21061 – a general definitional statute not cited by OPR in support of its proposal – defines an EIR as “a detailed statement setting forth the matters specified in Sections 21100 and 21100.1[,]” this general reference is of unclear import and per CEQA’s own terms governs “[u]nless the context otherwise requires. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 2:46 am
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Gonzalez v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 2:59 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Murphy v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 11:35 am
Sports & Ent. [read post]
