Search for: "U.S. v. Jane Doe"
Results 181 - 200
of 500
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2018, 2:37 am
”The case is Rentmeester v Nike Inc, 9th U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Wade es 410 U.S. 123 y la de Doe v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm
Defendants May Rebut the Fraud-on-the-Market Presumption by the Preponderance of the Evidence, Which Does Not Require “Conclusive” Evidence Adhering to its prior decision in Waggoner v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 7:45 am
We’ve already gone to court on behalf of Jane Doe, Jane Poe, Jane Roe, and Jane Moe, so that they could get the abortions they wanted, but we know that there are more Janes out there. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:51 am
Garza, 17-654, involves an unaccompanied teenager (known as “Jane Doe” to protect her privacy) who was caught trying to enter the United States illegally. [read post]
6 Jan 2018, 6:15 am
Elena Chachko summarized Alyan v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:31 am
Ferber, the U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
[This last point is the one that is disputed in the Jane Doe case: As we explain in a footnote, it is unclear whether any counsel for Doe—let alone any member of the Supreme Court Bar—ever represented to a government lawyer that the abortion would not or could not be performed until Thursday, Oct. 26.*] In the meantime, however, Government officials, including counsel, were making efforts to obtain the drug as soon as possible, and… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:39 pm
In the Jane Doe case that was the subject of the October oral argument, the government insisted that this was the case even where, as there, abortion was illegal in the minor's county of origin (see p. 29).This "no undue burden because the minor can depart the U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
McRae and Webster v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm
District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly’s order last month in Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
” In an op-ed at The Hill, David Luban argues that “[t]he irony is that filing frivolous accusations with the Supreme Court is itself an ethics violation — and DOJ’s accusations against Jane Doe’s lawyers come perilously close to crossing that line. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm
In the following guest post, attorneys from the Paul Weiss law firm review a recent Second Circuit decision on this issue, Waggoner v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am
The SG’s petition asks the Supreme Court to review a decision of the en banc U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:30 am
District Court for the District of Columbia issued a memorandum opinion and order in the case of Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 2:30 pm
Jane crossed the U.S. border on her own in September. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am
Its best pages vividly describe the Virginia that Harry Byrd dominated, first as governor and then as U.S. [read post]
