Search for: "U.S. v. Pope" Results 181 - 200 of 227
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2010, 12:06 pm by David Walk
The rule has the virtue of simplicity, but simplicity is not the highest virtue, or else Sarah Palin would be Pope. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:30 pm by Elie Mystal
Not “make a British court find against the Pope in favor of an atheist cult” interesting, but it’s a nice little wrinkle.Ricky Roehr, U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
A permanent Portuguese fort was established at Arguin in 1448, and the 1452 Dum Diversas papal bull of Pope Nicholas V specifically authorized Alfonso V of Portugal, …full and free permission to invade, search out, capture, and subjugate the Saracens and pagans and any other unbelievers and enemies of Christ wherever they may be… and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 3:35 pm by Simon Lester
Continuing with my occasional (although becoming somewhat frequent) posts on NAFTA Chapter 11 non-discrimination standards, there is a new decision to talk about: Merrill & Ring v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 7:36 am by Lyle Denniston
The Court agreed to hear the Bruesewitz case after asking for the U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 11:01 pm by charonqc
Sally Bercow v EyeSpyMP, or An interesting dimension the BBC missed. [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:51 am
They had no interest in the Church's intolerant doctrines, which could not possibly be implemented in the U.S. anyway. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 1:18 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property Play About Pope's 1978 Death Did Not Infringe U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 3:09 pm
Pope, 08-345). ** Whether the city of Philadelphia owes back pay for overtime to paramedics who do not regularly fight fire. [read post]