Search for: "U.S. v. Steward*" Results 181 - 200 of 307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2008, 11:02 pm
Next, after exploring how the Supreme Court's lesson about the importance of the PHOSITA in KSR v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
McRae, 448 U.S. 297, 301 (1980)—including, most fundamentally, the requirement to use the federal dollars on the categories of persons that Congress has deemed eligible for assistance by providing them the types of benefits that Congress has prescribed. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
The year 2019 is ending with the great rifts--opened in 2016, exposed in 2017, and acquiring a greater urgency and revealing the power of its consequences in 2018--now exposed. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 5:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, this ban — again, if it’s read as covering businesses’ speech — is likely unconstitutionally overbroad, in violation of the First Amendment, see U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:41 am
O’Brien III, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Thursday, January 19, 2023 Tags: Cryptocurrency, M&A, Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Securities Act, SPACs, Wong v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:41 am
O’Brien III, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Thursday, January 19, 2023 Tags: Cryptocurrency, M&A, Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Securities Act, SPACs, Wong v. [read post]
Structural Shifts: concomitant widespread elimination of (i) supermajority voting requirements, (ii) staggered or classified board terms, and (iii) stockholder rights plans (often done to avoid or compromise likely stockholder proposals), accompanied by limitations on (iv) change-in-control executive severance agreements, along with (v) increased stockholder rights to call special stockholder meetings, in tandem with (vi) highly publicized proposals advocating multiflavored… [read post]