Search for: "U.S. v. Vance"
Results 181 - 200
of 393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
At the original trial the jury awarded $520,000 compensation for the appropriated land, as well as $300,000 for damages to the residue after the appropriation. 1 125 U.S. 2655 (2005). 2 2005 Ohio 6469; 2005 Ohio App. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am
On Jan. 22, the U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:55 pm
On Friday, the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) reversed the abatement in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:21 am
Roe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 11:47 am
And on the National Security Law Podcast, Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck discussed the retirement of military commissions Judge Vance Spath, arguments in Doe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 1:05 pm
For the last decade he has been a judge on the U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 7:32 am
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck covered Zaidan v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm
The case, Apple v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 2:05 pm
Judge Royce Lamberth of the U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 5:24 am
Richard Fontaine and Vance Serchuk challenged Congress to take a more active role in U.S. military operations overseas. [read post]
8 May 2018, 12:13 pm
Circuit Court’s judgment affirming Judge Tanya Chutkan’s April 19 transfer injunction in Doe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 8:30 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in 1967 in the landmark case of Afroyim v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 8:30 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in 1967 in the landmark case of Afroyim v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:24 am
Calhoun 516 U.S. 1999 (1996)). [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:37 pm
Suing terrorists—and their banks: a discussion of JASTA, the Anti-Terrorism Act, and the recent Second Circuit ruling in Linde v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:10 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 1:20 pm
William Ford posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Rubin v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 11:00 am
Vance Spath. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:11 am
Vance Spath placed the United States v. [read post]
