Search for: "US v. Crawford" Results 181 - 200 of 1,277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2008, 1:12 pm
The petitioner wanted to use the Ohio v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 9:22 pm
The QP in Melendez-Diaz is "Whether a state forensic analyst's laboratory report prepared for use in a criminal prosecution is 'testimonial' evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause as set forth in Crawford v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:13 pm by Michael O'Hear
The Supreme Court reinvigorated the right of criminal defendants to cross-examine adverse witnesses in Crawford v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 3:45 am
Crager (discussed here), the Ohio Supreme Court held that the testimony of laboratory analysts wasn’t subject to Crawford v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 8:07 am
" And "testimony" in turn, as expressed by the Supreme Court, "is typically '[a] solemn declaration or affirmation made for the purpose of establishing or proving some fact" (Crawford v Washington, 541 US 36 [2004]). [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Crawford v Himmelstein ; 2011 NY Slip Op 31669(U);  Supreme Court, New York County; Docket Number: 115432/10; Judge: Donna M. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 2:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Crawford v Himmelstein ; 2011 NY Slip Op 31669(U); ; Supreme Court, New York County; Docket Number: 115432/10; Judge: Donna M. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:41 am by Russ Bensing
  The 3rd District had answered “no,” holding that the right of confrontation, as interpreted in Crawford v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 6:57 am
  To close the week, the Ninth Circuit applied its newly-described wisdom in US v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:48 am by Kim Krawiec
Many, many thanks to our fabulous tax bloggers Bridget Crawford, Lisa Milot, Paul Stephan, and Larry Zelenak for joining in the discussion of Perez v. [read post]