Search for: "US v. Fitch" Results 181 - 200 of 250
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2011, 2:21 pm
On the one hand, it seems crazy to sentence David Fitch for killing his wife. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am by Marie Louise
Abercrombie & Fitch (EDTexweblog.com) District Court Massachusetts finds Vlingo did not infringe Nuance Communications’ patent – Article One contributes to reexamination (Patent Quality Matters)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Acer – Just what Judge Yeakel wanted … Motion to transfer Marshall patent case to Austin granted – Prior pending case in transferee court: Bandspeed v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm by Marie Louise
(Class 99)   United States US General Federal Circuit judicial watch (Patently-O)   US Patent Reform USPTO prepares for historic rule making effort (Patents Post Grant Blog)   US Patents Top 5: Countries where US patents originate (Patent Quality Matters) Top 5: US patent classifications in 2010 (Patent Quality Matters) Essay: Not so confidential: A call for restraint in sealing court records (Patently-O) What Congress should do to improve… [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:30 pm
 Marshall also considered Levi Strauss v Abercrombie & Fitch and the degree of similarity which was needed in order to establish confusion. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:13 am by Gordon Firemark
Specifically, Levi believes that the stitch used on the back pocket for Abercrombie &Fitch blue jeans is too close in design to the stitch used on Levi’s blue jeans. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Abercrombie & Fitch – Plaintiff’s cost-of-defense strategy warrants early claim construction and departure from typical schedule: Parallel Networks, LLC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) Raylon – Less-than-cost-of-defense settlements do not warrant Rule 11 sanctions when used to raise capital for litigation: Raylon, LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm by Marie Louise
Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Company (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition to MYCHEW over HI-CHEW for candy (TTABlog) WYHA? [read post]