Search for: "US v. Holt" Results 181 - 200 of 337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2014, 4:29 am by Amy Howe
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Marci Hamilton previews next week’s argument in Holt v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the employee’s remaining discrimination and retaliation claims failed, largely because the record was clear that he was terminated because he failed to turn in FMLA paperwork and he accepted a better-paying job (Holt v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am by Dave
One answer to this, perhaps drawing on Gillett v Holt, is that a lack of clarity can be made up by the extent of the detriment undertaken by the Claimant (?). [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am by Dave
One answer to this, perhaps drawing on Gillett v Holt, is that a lack of clarity can be made up by the extent of the detriment undertaken by the Claimant (?). [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 8:04 am by Nick Austin and Sofia Papaspyropoulou
Contractual interpretation The Court first set out to construe Clause 11 of the Charterparty by applying the following usual principles of construction: (a) Its meaning was to be assessed in the light of (i) its natural and ordinary meaning, (ii) any other relevant provisions of the contract, (iii) the overall purpose of the clause and the contract, (iv) the facts and circumstances known or assumed by the parties at the time that the contract was made, and (v) commercial common sense… [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) An appeal to the new Patent Office Director: Repeal the single sentence rule (Patently-O) ‘Troll Tracker’ defamation suit - trial underway: Albritton v Cisco (Patently-O) (EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (The Prior Art) Q2 2009 sees record number of US green patents (Green Patent Blog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: District Court’s summary judgment opinion found to be inconsistent with its own claim… [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:01 am by Amy Howe
  Briefly: Last Week Tonight With John Oliver (video, occasional profanity) reenacts the oral argument in Holt v. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 2:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
For example in Holt v United States, 218 U.S. 245, the defendant was required to put on a blouse to see if it fits and it was held that his Fifth Amendment rights were not violated. [read post]