Search for: "US v. Michael Jacobs" Results 181 - 200 of 288
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Deposition2007-02-20 Nix v GSK, 2007 WL 7079369 (Serevent) Deposition2007-02-09 Jacob v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am by Cormac Early
In Bloomberg View, Michael Kinsley argues that Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Antonin Pribetic
  “Evidence of fraud undetectable by the foreign court” and the mention of “new and material facts” in [Jacobs v. [read post]
19 May 2012, 7:53 am by Paul Jacobson
Here is an extract of her column which is worth reading in its entirety: Did we think the image of President Jacob Zuma by Brett Murray was particularly beautiful to persuade us to publish it? [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:25 pm by Joe Mullin
Oracle: "Clean Room," "Open Source," "Fair Use" are irrelevant Oracle's lead lawyer, Michael Jacobs, started out by reminding jurors that many of the defenses that would have applied in the copyright phase don't apply in the patent phase. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:41 am by Walter Olson
” [Peter Spiro, OJ] New Third Circuit opinion in remanded U.S. v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:53 pm by Joe Mullin
"The two patents in this case are about making phones run fast," said Oracle attorney Michael Jacobs. [read post]
7 May 2012, 9:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
The quote of the day came from Oracle's lawyer Michael Jacobs who indicated to the court “I think you’ll be pleased to know that fair use is not an issue in the patent case. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:32 pm
" Jacobs ridiculed the fair use argument, saying it was merely Google's "first excuse. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 11:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Dogan: Michael Madow and others have created a rich literature. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
On Monday 12 March 2012 Sharp J gave a brief judgment in the case of British Pregnancy Advisory Service v The person using the alias “Pablo Escobar” – the case relating to the hacking of the claimant’s website ([2012] EWHC 572 (QB)). [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by Bexis
Deposition2007-02-20 Nix v GSK, 2007 WL 7079369 (Serevent) Deposition2007-02-09 Jacob v. [read post]