Search for: "US v. Morrison"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,406
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2020, 3:26 am
Comment The Barclays decision was handed down on the same day as WM Morrisons Supermarket PLC v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 12, another landmark ruling in relation to the vicarious liability of employers (specifically in relation to their liability for data breaches resulting from the actions of employees). [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
This listing occurs without regard to the likelihood that certiorari will be granted.Issues: (1) Whether passing Morrison v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 3:45 pm
Justice Scalia flagged it in NLRB v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 10:32 pm
I'll just give one example written by a major U.S. law firm (Morrison & Foerster):"Only if the SEP holder has followed those steps and the alleged infringer continues to use the SEPs in question, and fails to make a FRAND counter-offer and provide security, may the SEP holder seek an injunction. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm
On 1 April 2020 the Supreme Court handed down the judgment in the case of WM Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants([2020] UKSC 12), where it reversed the decision of the Court of Appeal and found that Morrisons was not vicariously liable for a rogue employee who posted payroll data of 100,000 other employees on a file-sharing website. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 10:36 am
Conversely, the Morrisons case was brought using a Group Litigation Order – effectively a form of “opt in” group action. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
The Court held possession of a gun was not economic (in Lopez), but that possession of marijuana for home use was (in Gonzales v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 3:22 pm
Here is the introduction from Lane v. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm
United States Netflix has won a defamation case for the show When They See Us, which tells the story of the Central Park Five. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:30 am
WM Morrisons Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6-7 November 2019. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Aven v Orbis Business Intelligence, heard 16 to 19 March 2020 (Warby J) Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon, heard 12 March 2020 (Nicklin J) ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 3 and 4 March 2020 (Underhill, Bean and Simon LJJ) Sube v News Group Newspapers, heard 4 to 7 February 2020 (Warby J) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v V [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
One concern the Daily Mirror had related to allegations that MGN’s legal department had been aware of widespread use of unlawful information gathering techniques. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:31 am
Posted by Kevin Harnisch (Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP) and David Ho and Nepomuk Loesti (American International Group, Inc.), on Friday, March 6, 2020 Tags: Extraterritoriality, Foreign issuers, International governance, Liability standards, Morrison v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
My suspicion is that the president’s lawyers are inspired by Justice Antonin Scalia’s famous dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:14 am
Trump v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 3 and 4 March 2020 (Underhill, Bean and Simon LJJ) Hayden v Associated Newspapers, heard 3 March 2020 (Julian Knowles J) Sube v News Group Newspapers, heard 4 to 7 February 2020 (Warby J) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various… [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:18 pm
This all changed when the US Supreme Court issued its decision in Morrison v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:56 am
I responded that this position is inconsistent with both the majority and dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
