Search for: "US v. Simmons"
Results 181 - 200
of 746
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2017, 8:19 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 9:29 am
Trade mark enthusiasts will be certainly aware that a few days ago bad news reached Red Bull.Katfriend Darren Meale (Simmons&Simmons) explains it all.Here's what Darren writes:"Red Bull, the energy drink brand phenomenon, comes in blue and silver cans. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:57 am
The well-known High Court judge, who took the audience carefully through various key cases on the topic (such as the CJEU Lindt case (C-529/07) and the Redbull v Sun Mark case ([2012] EWHC 1929 (Ch)), focussed specifically on the link between intention to use and the requirement for the EUTM holder not to register the trade mark in ‘bad faith. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:53 am
Simmons, 233 S.W.3d 235, 237 (Mo. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 7:41 am
Simmons, 798 S.E.2d 441 (2017) (unpublished) (same result). [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
[Disclosure: colleagues at Simmons&Simmons acted on this case].2. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:38 am
Assn. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 3:05 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:44 am
The case is Neptune v DeVOL Kitchens [2017] EWHC 2172.FactsNeptune makes kitchens. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:36 pm
So, this is an extension of the famous US Supreme Court case; Roper v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:48 pm
Two years ago the Texas Forensic Science Commission launched an investigation into forensics surrounding DNA mixtures, finding that most Texas agencies, including DPS, were using invalid mathematical techniques to analyze DNA mixture evidence. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:22 pm
More than you’d think, thanks to the decision of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) in Continental Reifen Deutschland v Compagnie generale des etablissements Michelin Case C‑84/16 P [2017] EUECJ C-84/16 (26 July 2017).Katfriend Darren Meale (Simmons&Simmons) explains it all.Here’s what Darren writes:“X versus XKINGThe two marks shown in the table below faced off in an opposition before the EUIPO. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:27 pm
Graham v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
The IPKat's Eleonora Rosati is joining forces with Simmons&Simmons to organise a panel discussion devoted to analysing the judgment, as well as its significance for both EU copyright law and the policy discussion currently unfolding in Brussels.Re-using Amazon item numbers (ASINs) for similar goods can constitute trade mark infringement and passing offGuestKat Rosie Burbidge (probably a fan of the big bang theory) analyzes the recent IPEC case, Jadebray & Noa… [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 2:23 am
| US Supreme Court uses TC Heartland to blunt key troll tool, but will California welcome the next wave of troll litigation? [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
| US Supreme Court uses TC Heartland to blunt key troll tool, but will California welcome the next wave of troll litigation? [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
Dist. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:56 am
Several justices in previous cases, such as Mitchell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:18 am
Simmons-Harris, the court said that it was constitutionally permissible for the government to allow vouchers to be used in parochial schools. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:59 pm
Simmons-Harris. [read post]
