Search for: "US v. William Slate"
Results 181 - 200
of 264
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2013, 12:54 pm
The sentence for the assault goes up, we don't bother with charging and convicting King for the rapes, and we rest our heads on the pillow of Williams v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm
Section 50.10 begins with the reason for restrictions on the subpoena power: “Because freedom of the press can be no broader than the freedom of reporters to investigate and report the news, the prosecutorial power of the government should not be used in such a way that it impairs a reporter’s responsibility to cover as broadly as possible controversial public issues. [read post]
3 May 2013, 11:16 am
Interestingly, the Volokh Conspiracy notes that the New York Supreme Court held today in Bezio v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:42 am
By William W. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
” And in an op-ed for The Cincinnati Enquirer, Verna Williams discusses Justice Scalia’s comments at last week’s oral argument. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 10:43 am
William White of Pennsylvania in 1782:I. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
In one case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
This weekend’s coverage of the Court highlights some of the high-profile cases slated for oral argument in the second half of the Term. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 2:57 am
I was especially intrigued when, a few months ago, Ben sent me a preview of his most recent article, called Non-Market Values in Family Businesses, which is slated for publication later this year in the William & Mary Law Review. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
According to this great piece by William Saletan at Slate, "the case seems to have been a total scam." [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 11:48 pm
The theories of evidence and inference that now dominate the law are firmly planted in the so-called rationalist tradition of evidence scholarship, a tradition that has been masterfully described by William Twining.3 In that tradition, it is axiomatic that all knowledge of facts is merely probable and always uncertain. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 11:35 am
Krist and William T. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:04 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
Bob Taft and George V. [read post]
19 May 2012, 3:14 am
" pjblack.me/JkGfYB from @BW: "How Mark Zuckerberg Hacked the Valley" pjblack.me/JUkL7M from @wired: "It's Tinkerers v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am
bit.ly/Ij3Ytl (Sharon Nelson) Google Offers Big-Data Analytics – nyti.ms/JoDZ1T (Quentin Hardy) House Passes Two Cybersecurity Bills – bit.ly/JoC5hK (Hunton & Williams) ICO Issues First Penalty To The NHS Following Serious Data Breach - bit.ly/IjTZI1 (ICO) ISO27001 v SSAE 16 For Information Security - bit.ly/Ko7sJX (Andy Techholz) Is Someone Reading your Email in a Dirty Cloud? [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:29 am
” At Slate, Akhil Amar offers advice on what Solicitor General Verrilli “should have said. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 3:18 pm
Donohoo v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Slating, Timothy A. and Jay P. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 7:07 am
On the other hand, it may not always be so easy to tell whether one's statement about oneself is true, a point illustrated by William Saletan's Slate piece discussing the "truth" of Mitt Romney's insistence that he has not changed his stance on reproductive freedom. [read post]
