Search for: "United Public Workers v. State " Results 181 - 200 of 2,652
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2014, 3:27 am by Jon Gelman
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ JAY BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 8:11 am by Elena Chachko
Al-Halabi’s trial began on Tuesday, and it is not open to the public. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 8:39 am by Arslan Sheikh
By Arslan Sheikh On Wednesday, June 27, 2018, the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 5-to-4 decision that the application of public sector union fees to nonmembers is a violation of the nonmembers’ First Amendment rights. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 2:09 pm
In 2002 the United States Supreme Court decided Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v NLRB. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
Instead of an increase in cost per treatment or per unit cost of a service such as a doctor’s visit, it is the amount of services and the types of services being used driving medical inflation. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
United States Supreme Court has taken a giant leap forward to facilitate the Federalization of the entire nation's workers' compensation system. [read blog]
4 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
United States Supreme Court has taken a giant leap forward to facilitate the Federalization of the entire nation's workers' compensation system. [read blog]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
The United States District Court in Norfolk handed down an interesting decision this week in Senture, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
Further, public policy limitations on arbitrability are rare and "almost invariably" involve a nondelegable constitutional or statutory duty (Matter of Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y. v New York State Pub. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 5:37 am by Jon L. Gelman
As is relevant to this certified question, the complaint alleges that in the years Wanda was exposed to asbestos, particularly between 1950 and 1969, the Shipyard knew or had reason to know of the dangers that asbestos posed to workers’ family members and members of the public, including Wanda. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am by Amy Howe
  In two of the new cases, United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:27 pm by jbyrne
On Tuesday, April 17, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Filarsky v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 1:28 pm by National Indian Law Library
River Spirit Casino (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, jurisdiction)United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 8:50 am
Yesterday, Whistleblowers in  United States ex. rel.Fowler v. [read post]