Search for: "United States District Court for the District Wyoming" Results 181 - 200 of 558
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2013, 12:12 pm
A fourth offense is a Felony in the following states if a prior offense occurred within the previous five years: Alabama, Arkansas, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 10:03 am by Lisa A. Mazzie
The decision is also likely to mean that the other states covered by those federal appellate court districts—Colorado, Kansas, North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia, and Wyoming—will also allow same-sex marriage. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:43 am by Amy Howe
” But the state post-conviction court would not consider any evidence of potential racial bias, and a federal district court also declined to consider that evidence. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm by George Ticoras, Esq.
Federal Election Commission (docket 12-536), the United States Supreme Court ruled aggregate limits on federal campaign contributions are an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment’s guarantee of political expression and association. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:56 am by WSLL
Issues: Whether Appellant was denied his right to present a defense to the jury guaranteed by Art. 1, § 10 of the Wyoming Constitution and the United States Constitution. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 1:53 pm by WSLL
Whether the district court erred in refusing to declare that the District’s Drug Testing Policy violates Article 1, § 6 of the Wyoming Constitution, and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:00 am
The ACLU moved for an immediate injunction on criminal prosecution of the girls and said injunction was granted by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, holding that the photographs in question did not constitute child pornography and were therefore protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 5:38 am
In the present action, the district court correctly ruled Appellant did not have standing to challenge the vehicle search, and that conclusion applies to the constitutionality of the search under both the state and United States constitutions. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:03 pm by David Kopel
The D.C. government lost on this issue in federal district court. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 5:16 am by Cannabis Law Group
The federal district court had tossed the case, but the appellate court decision revives it. [read post]