Search for: "United States District Court for the District of Minnesota"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,433
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
In United Islamic Society v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 3:43 pm
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution Among other liberties, the First Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees freedom of speech by prohibiting the government from restricting the rights of citizens to speak freely on most topics under the sun. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:04 pm
The court did not cite the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 7:45 am
The Ivey case is File No. 08-CV-6407-JRT/JJK, pending in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 12:39 pm
October 9, 2009 - Gregory Bell, a former Chicago hedge fund manager and owner of Lancelot Investment Management, LLC, pled guilty to one count of wire fraud yesterday in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
Kite, The History of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (Indiana Historical Society Press, 2007); Mark Edward Lender, "This Honorable Court": The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, 1789-2000 (Rutgers University Press, 2006); John O. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 10:19 am
., was sentenced to 63 months in federal prison by United States District Court Judge Donovan Frank for his role in a mortgage fraud kickback scheme. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:12 am
Los Angeles - Honeywell has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Nest Labs, Inc. in a United States District Court in Minnesota. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 2:25 pm
On January 2, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (“Tenth Circuit”) denied the State of Oklahoma’s motion for a stay pending appeal to the United States Supreme Court and one week later transferred jurisdiction back to the district court[1] regarding Pharmaceutical Care Management Association v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
Kaman (right), Judge of the Hennepin County District Court, Minneapolis, Minnesota. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
United States. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:34 am
In a complaint filed in United States District Court, (Central District (Los Angeles)), Plaintiff Dr. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 1:00 pm
Sommers [PDF] Judge Anderson whispers: the state doesn't have the source code [Minn Lawyer Blog] Related: Roman law - Supreme Court - United States - Philosophy - Law [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 10:39 am
A new lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, against Mentor Worldwide (a Delaware corporation with its headquarters in Santa Barbara, California); Coloplast A/S (based in Denmark); Coloplast Corporation (a Delaware corporation based in Minneapolis); and Coloplast Manufacturing (a Delaware corporation based in North Mankato, Minnesota). [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 12:56 pm
Core Consulting Group – United States District Court – District of Minnesota – July 26th, 2017) involves a consulting agreement between the plaintiff (MSI) and the defendant (Core) for the former to possibly pursue an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP). [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 8:00 am
Magnuson of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota granted Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss a shareholder class action that had been initiated following a 2013 holiday season data breach involving customers of Target Corporation (“Target,” or “the Company”). [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:17 pm
On May 2, 2013, United States District Court Judge David S. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 5:32 am
Among the survivors of that group was future United States District Court Judge for the District of Minnesota William Lochren. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 9:10 am
Omer Abdi Mohamed, also known as “Brother Omer” and “Galeyr,” who was indicted on November 17, 2009, entered his plea before United States District Court Chief Judge Michael J. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:01 pm
We therefore conclude that the district court erred in permitting the officer to testify about appellant’s pre-counseled, pre-arrest, and pre-Miranda silence in the state’s case-in-chief. [read post]
