Search for: "United States v. Best" Results 181 - 200 of 12,018
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The 114-page complaint reads in part:Columbia ... has for decades been one of the worst centers of academic antisemitism in the United States. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Alessandro Maurini, The Missed Revolution at the Origins of the United States (2022). 6. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Katie Calogero and Daniel Alvarado
United States, the protester challenged the North American Industry Classification System (“NAICS”) code designation chosen by the agency and affirmed by the SBA Office of Hearing and Appeals (“OHA”).[2]The Court agreed with the protester that the NAICS code for environmental consulting services, rather than the NAICS code for research and development (“R&D”), was not the best choice. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:57 pm by Matthew D. Roy
People saddled with unbearable debts are often able to take advantage of the United States bankruptcy laws and seek relief by filing a petition for bankruptcy. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 3:53 pm by Amy Howe
In November, the justices heard United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 11:15 am by Brett Trout
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has just issued guidance  indicating inventions created solely by artificial intelligence are not protectable by patent and no artificial intelligence system may be named as an inventor on a patent application. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, as the plaintiffs themselves noted, the novel upon which 13 Reasons Why was based "was a hit, making the New York Times' young-adult best-seller list a few times. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:15 am by franchiselawadmin
Section 280E refers to a provision in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of the United States. 280E has significant implications for businesses involved in the sale of controlled substances, including marijuana (or “cannabis” under Minnesota law). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:15 am by franchiselawadmin
Section 280E refers to a provision in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of the United States. 280E has significant implications for businesses involved in the sale of controlled substances, including marijuana (or “cannabis” under Minnesota law). [read post]