Search for: "United States v. Board of Educ. of City of Union City" Results 181 - 200 of 248
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2011, 3:59 am
Public policy does not nullify the choice she made (cf., Matter of Abramovich v Board of Educ., 46 NY2d 450, cert denied 444 US 845). [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:27 am
Competing union interestsBuffalo CSD v Local 264, 270 AD2d 814Suppose an arbitration award in favor of an employee in one collective bargaining unit adversely affects an employee of the same employer in another collective bargaining unit. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:55 am
The Fourteenth Amendment means that a local or state government employer may not involuntarily retire a public employee from his or her work without due process of law, citing Board of Regents v Roth, 408 U.S. 564 and Cleveland Board of Education v Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532; and3. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:26 am
Assn., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, County of Chautauqua Unit 6300, Chautauqua County Local 807, 8 NY3d 513[Matter of County of Chautauqua v Civil Serv. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:19 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
  But by treating "houses of worship" as the units from which to sample, a disproportionately heavy representation of Christians is the inev [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:05 pm by PJ Blount
(a) Section 40117(l)(7) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking `August 2, 2010. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
In that spirit, Roberts last week denounced President Obama’s criticism of the Court in his State of the Union address, saying that the occasion had “degenerated to a political pep rally. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
Further, public policy limitations on arbitrability are rare and "almost invariably" involve a nondelegable constitutional or statutory duty (Matter of Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y. v New York State Pub. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:39 am
”As the current dispute depends on the interpretation of the CBA's no-layoff clause in order to determine whether that provision is applicable to the Village's action in abolishing six firefighters' positions, the court ruled that this was an issue that the parties agreed to submit to arbitration.Thus, said the court, Supreme Court properly determined that the parties' substantive disagreement as to the meaning and application of the no-layoff clause is to be resolved by… [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
  A wrap-up essay will then focus on some potentially constructive policy reforms that could assist media enterprises without a massive infusion of state support or regulation of the press. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:35 pm by azatty
Board of Education, circa 1954. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]