Search for: "United States v. Bush, Jr." Results 181 - 200 of 221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2020, 12:28 pm by Marcia Coyle
The late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who often was in dissent in the court’s 5-4 decisions each term, once offered what seemed to be a message not just about the court but for all Americans when they believe the court is “out of whack” in whatever direction: Referring to her late husband, Ginsburg remarked, “Marty used to say the true symbol of the United States is not the bald eagle. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Bush (commander in chief): release Ray and the others today/tonight! [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm by John Malcolm
These subpoenas — born, one suspects, out of enmity for this president — implicate important issues of separation of powers and federalism, including: the legitimate scope of congressional oversight; the ability of a state prosecutor to investigate and possibly indict a sitting president; whether United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am by Vincent LoTempio
Bush advanced the rights of a large segment of the citizens of the United States of America. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
v=eTnHjYOFuB4"} ) CITIZENS UNITED WON'T GET SECOND LOOK Arizona's law wasn't all the high court tackled. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
He last appeared before the Supreme Court in November 2002, six months before the Senate confirmed his nomination to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:00 pm
Since then, Judge Ginsburg has remained a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:04 am
The Supreme Court rejected without comment an appeal from Khaled el-Masri, effectively endorsing Bush administration arguments that state secrets would be revealed if courts allowed the case to proceed. [read post]