Search for: "United States v. Cross" Results 181 - 200 of 7,375
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am by centerforartlaw
By Alexandra Even Banksy’s anonymity is as a part of his brand as his art. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 10:29 am by Ilya Somin
 (NA)  Yesterday, the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled against Texas in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:24 am by Ilya Somin
United States (1992), which established the rule that the Tenth Amendment bars federal "commandeering" of state governments. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Japan said it has asked the United States to suspend all non-emergency V-22 Osprey flights over its region after one of the U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Props., LLC v Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P., 195 AD3d 1502, 1502-1503; Mazzurco v PII Sam, LLC, 153 AD3d 1341, 1342; Desiderio v Geico Gen. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 12:29 pm by JURIST Staff
Ghana, a member state of the United Nations, stood alongside 119 other nations on October 27, 2023, in favor of a humanitarian truce in Gaza. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
It was a huge setback for efforts to dismantle the ongoing privilege of whiteness in the United States and is symptomatic of resistance among movement conservatives on and off the Court to efforts to build a more inclusive society.In both respects, Students for Fair Admissions is a deeply undemocratic decision. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by CMS
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) announced earlier this month a new policy which aims to encourage organisations to voluntarily self-disclose any misconduct uncovered during the process of mergers and acquisitions (M&A). [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 3:59 am by jonathanturley
There are so many criminal laws that do criminalize speech, and so the notion that the president of the United States somehow has a First Amendment right to be protected by the government for his speech doesn’t make any sense. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Martinez
During debates, state Democrats argued that the bill is intended to challenge Arizona v. [read post]