Search for: "United States v. Detente"
Results 181 - 200
of 3,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
Cancellation recognizes longtime LPRs’ deep ties to the United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:20 am
R (on the application of HA (Nigeria)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 979 (Admin) – Read judgment The detention of a mentally ill person in an Immigration Removal Centre (IRC) amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment and false imprisonment, and was irrational, the High Court has ruled. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
Circuit’s 2010 opinion in Al-Bihani v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
GEO owned and operated the Northwest Detention Center (“NWDC”), a 120,000 square foot private detention facility on the Tacoma tide flats, pursuant to a contract with the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (“ICE”). [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 9:07 pm
He told one attorney that the position being taken by detainees’ counsel would “put our nation at risk; you want the United States to fight Al-Qaeda with its hands tied behind its back. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 4:31 am
As a consequence, for now the Court leaves intact the state secrets doctrine of United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
On Dec. 11, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia heard arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 2:44 am
United States</i> appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:09 am
R (Binyan Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2008] EWHC 2048 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 295 “The principles set out by the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133 could be applied in novel circumstances to require the Foreign Secretary to disclose information, specific to the claimant and essential to his defence to serious charges which might carry the death penalty, in confidence to… [read post]
31 May 2012, 4:47 am
The second is that the risk of Qatada absconding has increased, if he assumes, in the light of the expressed determination of the Secretary of State, that he would not avoid deportation to Jordan by litigation in and from the United Kingdom. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:11 am
Aceves, United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 9:09 am
Because Al Odah was found to be part of Al Qaeda previously, his detention is lawful still. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 3:23 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:44 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 5:58 am
Whether Plaintiffs, who were held in detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay, which the Supreme Court has previously characterized as a possession or territory of the United States, are “persons” who may avail themselves of the protections of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”); 2. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 9:39 am
” United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 9:27 am
Then, with the recent full withdrawal of the United States from Afghanistan, Gul appears to have expanded his argument to include a much-broader claim about the expiration of the legal grounds for detention. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 8:43 am
Today defense counsel to Mustafa al Hawsawi in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 1:34 pm
The American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Georgia and the ACLU of North Carolina today filed lawsuits in federal courts in Georgia and North Carolina on behalf of Mark Lyttle, a U.S. citizen of Puerto Rican descent with mental... [read post]
