Search for: "United States v. Diaz-Diaz"
Results 181 - 200
of 639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2014, 2:42 pm
As the Court of Appeals has explained, where a police officer has probable cause to believe that the driver of an automobile has committed a traffic violation, a stop does not violate the state or federal constitutions and neither the primary motivation of the officer nor a determination of what a reasonable traffic officer would have done under the circumstances is relevant akin to People v Robinson and Whren v United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:28 pm
According to defendant, the admission of those records in evidence violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution under Crawford v Washington. [read post]
Arizona District Court Certifies Class Of Lesbian And Gay State Employees In Denial Of Benefits Case
27 Dec 2013, 7:22 am
Maechtlen On December 23, 2013, in Diaz, et al. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 3:27 am
Diaz, 26 F.3d 1533 (U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 7:40 am
Melendez-Diaz, 129 S. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 1:40 pm
In 2010, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Padilla v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:07 pm
Diaz was released from jail, he was immediately picked up by “ICE”, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement unit, to remove him from the United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
After Diaz filed the lawsuit, the University filed a petition to cancel the Diaz trademark with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
In Diaz v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:26 pm
In Diaz v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 12:18 pm
Following the US Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:38 am
Smith and Ryan Duffy Last month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit raised the stakes on what has become one of the most prominent topics in the labor law community in recent times with its 2-1 decision in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:38 pm
’” Then, relying upon the Supreme Court’s brand-new decision in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 8:05 am
This revision seems to be a reaction to the Supreme Court’s decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:48 am
Second, Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure now require a sentencing court, before accepting a guilty plea, to ensure that the defendant understands “that, if convicted, a defendant who is not a United States citizen may be removed from the United States, denied citizenship, and denied admission to the United States in the future. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 2:16 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 1:25 pm
To understand why the federal guidelines for drug offenses need to be revised, read Judge Gleeson’s full opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am
United States, 447 U.S. 649, 656–657, 100 S.Ct. 2395, 2401–2402, 65 L.Ed.2d 410; United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:56 am
Hood, supra (quoting Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
