Search for: "United States v. First National Pictures, Inc" Results 181 - 200 of 287
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2013, 4:40 am by Susan Brenner
’ The document further stated, `You are an immigrant not in possession of a valid unexpired immigrant visa, reentry permit, border crossing card, or other valid entry document required by the Immigration and Nationality Act’, and `It is likely that you have engaged or will engage in unauthorized employment in the United States. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am by Editors
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am by Editors
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:09 pm by Mark Litwak
The court found against Leopold, stating that books, magazines, and motion pictures are forms of public expression protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
A Short History of State RFRAs The first, federal RFRA, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, was passed by Congress to trump the Supreme Court’s decision in Employment Div. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am by John L. Welch
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
However, today’s reality presents a very different picture. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
We’d be alarmed, for example, if the chairman of the FCC said the Telecommunications Act was for the telecom companies first and the nation second, and it’s not clear to me how your statement, if it was accurately reported, is any different. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
Lofgren took issue especially with Pallante’s remark during the interview that “Copyright is for the author first and the nation second. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am by Charles Johnson
Costs and Statistics There is no clear picture of the actual amount of money laundered globally. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 3:00 pm by Greg Mersol
   However, in 1983, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit rendered its decision in UAW v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Schutz Container Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
    In the following guest post, Jonathan Joseph (pictured to the left) takes a look at the extent to officers may defend themselves in reliance on the business judgment rule in cases to which California law applies. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:13 am by Wahab & Medenica LLC
Several states have laws that protect off-duty conduct, although it is unclear whether they apply to off-duty communications. [read post]