Search for: "United States v. Gonzalez"
Results 181 - 200
of 799
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2020, 7:03 am
Lamberth ruled in the case of United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 9:28 am
Remini, Robert V. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:05 pm
Ctr. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm
Gonzalez is cited in the following case: Kim Cramton v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:39 am
To address the surge in demand for mail voting, election officials across the United States have been scrambling to scale vote-by-mail operations and to work with state legislatures and governors to adapt the rules and procedures for mail voting during the coronavirus pandemic. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 4:49 am
But it can't necessarily count on support from the courts.On Monday, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California will hold a case management conference relating to multiple App Store antitrust cases pending before her.Epic Games v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 1:43 am
On Friday, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Epic Games' motion for a preliminary injunction against Apple only with respect to its developer account for Unreal Engine, but it's still up to Epic itself to #FreeFortnite, though Epic's aggressive attitude makes a Ninth Circuit decision likely to be inevitable before the iOS version of Fortnite will return to the App Store.Late on… [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm
A few hours after I wrote that this Friday (October 9) and Monday (October 12) were the days on which the United States District Court for the Northern District of California was particularly likely to rule on Epic Games' motion for a preliminary injunction (PI)against Apple, and consistent with what I had told a major newspaper after Epic's temporary restraining order (TRO; blog post), Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has effectively converted the TRO into a PI… [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:49 pm
Jose Santos Sanchez and Sonia Gonzalez are a married couple from El Salvador who entered the United States without being inspected and admitted. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 5:05 am
Qualcomm this year) may even find it highly dissuasive.Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, who is presiding over the Epic Games v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 10:50 pm
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is still working on her decision on Epic Games' motion for a preliminary injunction against Apple. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:33 am
Epic Games v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:57 am
There have been further filings since the Epic Games v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 5:30 am
Apple vote appeared to dissuade Judge Gonzalez Rogers from considering Epic v. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 12:36 am
Early last week, Epic Games lost the first round of its #FreeFortnite battle against Apple when Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied the Fortnite maker's motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) with respect to the company's flagship game. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:12 am
On Monday afternoon, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California held an Epic Games v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:26 am
Approximately 18 hours ago, a clerk's notice already mentioned the possibility of Epic Games' antitrust action against Apple over its App Store terms and policies being reassigned to Oakland-based United States District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 10:11 am
Facts: This case (Gonzalez-Arroyo v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
In Gonzalez v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 6:11 am
The court in Gonzalez was interpreting a provision in Title III stating that “[i]n the case of property confiscated before March 12, 1996, a United States national may not bring an action under [the Act] ... unless such national acquires ownership of the claim before March 12, 1996. [read post]
