Search for: "United States v. Goodwill" Results 181 - 200 of 485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Gutierrez family continues with the tradition introducing La Michoacana to the United States. [read post]
27 May 2016, 11:31 am by Dave Aitel
Increasingly, my own customers in Silicon Valley, the New York financial sector, and overseas view the United States government as the chief adversary in information security. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am by Amy Howe
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in just one case:  United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:53 pm by Ron Coleman
 In short, the Fourth Circuit’s Balmora decision holds that in passing Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, Congress intended to protect Mexican citizens from coming to the United States and buying merchandise bearing ersatz Mexican trademarks that have never been used in commerce in the United States before they return to Mexico, because these visitors, Congress concluded, bring their goodwill with them. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The TTAB found that the preponderance of the evidence “readily establishe[d] blatant misuse of the FLANAX mark in a manner calculated to trade in the United States on the reputation and goodwill of petitioner’s mark created by its use in Mexico. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 10:00 pm
To obtain a patent, there is a (usually) lengthy and expensive application and prosecution process that occurs with the United State Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:20 am by Jani Ihalainen
One still has to appreciate that the copyright holder can at any time reassert their rights, and thus the copyright in the works is newly resurrected (although, as evident from the above, was never gone to begin with).Our cousins in the United States do accept the abandonment of copyrights in works. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 3:26 pm by Ron Coleman
 served as Special Trial Counsel for the United States Department of Justice in its antitrust suit against Microsoft. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 6:00 am by Barry Sookman
Justice Manson had suggested that the doctrine was not applicable in Canada, stating: Some United States Courts have held such use can cause “initial interest confusion”, where confusion is caused in the customer before actually purchasing a good or service, when the customer seeks a particular brand of goods or services, but is drawn or enticed to a competitor’s goods or services through the competitor’s use of the first company’s trade name… [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Other states may choose to take a different approach. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 3:39 am
It is reported that several years ago, the mark Pet Rock was registered as a trademark in the United States (unfortunately due to the power outage at the USPTO offices in suburban Washington DC, this Kat was unable to verify this information). [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am by Robert B. Milligan
Specifically, the webinar involved a discussion of non-compete and trade secret issues in Europe and China as compared to the United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
For pro bono lawyers, publicly discussing their work can build reputation and goodwill. [read post]