Search for: "United States v. Grant, III" Results 181 - 200 of 2,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2008, 8:12 am
The Supreme Court also granted certiorari in Bell v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:42 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S OPINION IN UNITED STATES v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:54 am by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court's orders list this morning does include certiorari grants as well as denials, and the Court did take up United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:53 pm by Olivier Theard
On October 15, 2013, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review six of the nine submitted petitions stemming from an appellate court ruling upholding Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) greenhouse gas (“GHG”) controls at utilities, factories and other facilities around the country. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:58 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
This is a birth injury claim against Defendants Calvert Memorial Hospital of Calvert County, that hospital’s emergency room and emergency room doctor, and the United States. [read post]
On Nov. 28, 2016, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas declined to grant a nationwide preliminary injunction enjoining the Department of Labor (DOL) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) from enforcing subparagraphs 1904.35(b)(1)(i), (iii), and (iv) of the final rule issued by OSHA titled “Improve Tracking Workplace Injuries and Illnesses,” 81 Fed. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Emma Kohse
Plaintiffs allege that President Trump did not meet a threshold requirement to issue an executive order under INA Sections 1182(f) and 1185(a) because he did not make sufficient findings that “the entry of a class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States” to justify the policy. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm by Deborah Heller
Part of the explanation for the repeal notes that the 2015 Rule exceeded the authority granted to the agencies by Congress by adopting an interpretation of the “significant nexus” test provided by Justice Kennedy in his concurrence in Rapanos v. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 6:03 am by Joel R. Brandes
On January 7, 2016, however, Harris made the decision to stay in the United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 4:39 pm by Steven Cohen
Nolan, III (mechanical engineering expert witnesses), Dr. [read post]
Eugia Pharma Specialties Ltd., the United States District Court for the District of Delaware recently granted both the Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ requests to stay the litigation, but denied the Plaintiffs’ additional request to toll the statutory 30-month stay under 21 U.S.C. [read post]
Eugia Pharma Specialties Ltd., the United States District Court for the District of Delaware recently granted both the Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ requests to stay the litigation, but denied the Plaintiffs’ additional request to toll the statutory 30-month stay under 21 U.S.C. [read post]
Eugia Pharma Specialties Ltd., the United States District Court for the District of Delaware recently granted both the Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ requests to stay the litigation, but denied the Plaintiffs’ additional request to toll the statutory 30-month stay under 21 U.S.C. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:00 am by Ingrid Wuerth
It provides: “This Rule applies only to an action invoking the Court’s original jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
United States, and this Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]