Search for: "United States v. Hole" Results 181 - 200 of 810
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
  In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:17 pm by Eva Galperin and Nate Cardozo
Our Ethiopia case is an example of a country deciding not to play by the rules, unleashing the Ethiopian national security apparatus on a dissident living in the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:31 pm by Dennis Crouch
 But the molecule that does all the work, they import from the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:59 pm by James Romoser
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will delve into that question in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 1:00 am by Jason Rantanen
This case also will be important when the United States becomes a party to the Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am by Florian Mueller
Later, the Court of Justice of the EU brought a bit more balance into that analysis with its Huawei v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 3:24 pm by Larry
United States while I try to take care of meaningful client work. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 7:10 am by Larry
United States, a Court of International Trade Case involving the classification of plastic children's clogs. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
The Court also dismissed the “foreign squared” claims — that is, claims by “investors who purchased their shares of UBS stock from within the United States” — i.e., claims from “a U.S. investor who places a buy order in the United States for a stock listed on a foreign exchange”, where, plaintiffs argued, the investor “completes his or her ‘purchase’ in the United States when the… [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:06 am
In Georgia and throughout the United States, governments have "sovereign immunity" for what they do. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 10:55 am by Pamela S. Karlan
United States: “Let me ask you this question: If we conclude there is a hole in the statute that Congress has to amend, is it more likely that Congress will cure the statute if we rule for you or if we rule against you? [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:37 am by SHG
Following the discussion about the utility of the Supreme Court stating a rule as to whether, and for how long, a car stop can be extended beyond its lawful justification, all of which arose out of the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Rodriguez v. [read post]