Search for: "United States v. I. L." Results 181 - 200 of 5,202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2021, 3:29 am
In this Ladas Memorial Award-winning article, the author considers the potential for a “Wild West” of obscene, profane, and vulgar trademarks used and registered in the United States following the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Matal v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 12:36 pm by Dan Ernst
Textually, I argue, the Indian Commerce Clause and Indians Not Taxed Clause serve as express authorization for Congress to create legal classifications based on Indian race and ancestry, so long as those classifications are not arbitrary, as the Supreme Court stated a century ago in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
As the United States is a party to these instruments, it must address the activities of vulture funds that violate the rights enshrined in them. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:52 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
I have nothing more to add to this post than the title itself. -- Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of TexasOpinion Date: 12/13/11Cite: Kenyon Int'l Emergency Svcs., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 12:54 pm
Count I seeks to enforce the R&L Agreement and related agreements invoking 8 Del. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 7:32 pm
Berry asks for reconsideration of this decision due to the United States Supreme Court's grant of certiorari in Baze v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am by Will Baude
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Michael McConnell, Sam Bray, and I recently completed and posted the 2023 online supplement to our constitutional law casebook: The Constitution of the United States. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:37 pm by Orin Kerr
Moore, I became super-interested in the constitutional status of United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:16 am by Gary L. Francione
On July 7, 2011, the Humane Society of the United States and United Egg Producers announced that they would “work together to seek a federal law that would require larger cages and other improved conditions for the nation’s 280 million laying hens. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:21 am
  Before he went to trial, Roden “moved to suppress” certain evidence, claiming it was  “obtained in violation of article I, section 7 of the Washington State Constitution, the [state] privacy act, and the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]