Search for: "United States v. Kaiser"
Results 181 - 200
of 205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2017, 11:15 am
”); see United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
COLA stated that the matter would be referred to COLA's Contract Fiscal Compliance Unit for a determination. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
This paper presents a survey of federal and state court decisions on these two questions, hoping to offer some guidance to practitioners. [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:22 pm
In Van Devent v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 3:25 pm
The purpose of the penalty, as the government explained to the Supreme Court in NFIB v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 1:43 am
These two arbitrators shall appoint by mutual agreement a third arbitrator, the Chairperson, who shall be a national of a third State. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Fisher, Louis, Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court is Not the Last Word on the Constitution (2019). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
#1 — DiCosolo v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:48 pm
In this post, we will state the facts of the investment arbitration. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 6:40 am
United States Mineral Products $8 million UNR Asbestos-Disease Claims n.a. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 9:01 am
State Medicaid Fraud Control Units. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
About 446 unit employees have Chinese surnames and were born in mainland China, Hong Kong, or Taiwan. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 11:05 am
What is a Medicare Advantage Special Investigations Unit (SIU)? [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Volpe, 401 US 402, 415 (1971) (decision of the Secretary of Transportation comes with a “presumption of regularity” concerning “the official acts of public officers and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties”), and United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Volpe, 401 US 402, 415 (1971) (decision of the Secretary of Transportation comes with a “presumption of regularity” concerning “the official acts of public officers and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties”), and United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:18 pm
Affiliated with the American Economic Association and the Allied Social Sciences Association of the United States, ASCE maintains professional contacts with economists inside Cuba —whether independent or associated with the Cuban government— who are interested in engaging in scholarly discussion and research. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:20 pm
Martin Andelman Mandelman Inc. 610 Newport Center Drive, Suite 950 Newport Beach, CA 92660 UNITED STATES Tel: 714-904-2288 E-mail: martin@mandelmaninc.com [Remember, Mandelman Inc. is a suspended corporation.] [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 1:52 pm
Lyle Denniston of SCOTUS Blog reported on a new Guantanamo detainee case coming before the Supreme Court, this time involving a Chinese citizen from a persecuted ethnic minority group there.IP LawThis section is dedicated to George Washington, who signed the First United States Patent Grant on July 31, 1790. [read post]
