Search for: "United States v. Levinson"
Results 181 - 200
of 271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2009, 3:50 am
The civil rights revolution begins with the Supreme Court's 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
In this circumstance, it is not surprising that leading Democratic politicians, progressive legal scholars, and centrist or center-left groups like Common Cause have portrayed a new convention called under Article V of the 1787 Constitution as an anathema that would destroy what is left of the federal system sustaining the United States. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Consider the now infamous case, United States v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:00 am
The United States of America – Keep the Presumption Intact; Meritorious Private Securities Fraud Cases Complement Criminal Prosecutions and Civil Enforcement Actions. [read post]
14 May 2018, 4:30 am
” Goldsmith also added: And just as with international law, there is no authoritative institution in the United States to settle the matter. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am
Like Joseph Story in his 1842 decision in Prigg v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 8:30 am
” Justice Alito argues that stare decisis should not require the Court to keep Casey, because, among other reasons, there has been no reliance on the right to abortion in the United States. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court has gone rogue. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
It is not the case that such an election process to the United States House of Representatives is required by the United States Constitution. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 3:01 am
See, e.g., Levinson v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm
” (Brief at p. 8)Of these, 1 and 2 are doing all the work, since 3 can be satisfied by any limitation at all on federal power – and as I and others have noted, that limitation is already provided by United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:10 pm
The United States legal culture has swallowed whole a largely false account of our legal history. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:38 pm
Levinson, decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1988, addresses this very question: whether information about a possible acquisition is material. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 9:59 am
Part V concludes with the problem of false constitutional necessity. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 7:22 am
Part V concludes with the problem of false constitutional necessity. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 6:15 am
The importance of this question is illustrated by the striking breadth of recent discussions, ranging from the interpretation of the United States Constitution as a guarantee of fundamental economic equality and proposals to restore the lost constitution to arguments for the virtual abandonment of structural provisions of the Constitution of 1789. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 12:38 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 1:20 pm
(Sandy Levinson wrote on the issue as well.) [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm
: The need to encourage legal entrepreneurship (Spicy IP) State’s copyright not exempt under RTI Act: Delhi Metro Rail Corp. v. [read post]
