Search for: "United States v. Lucas" Results 181 - 200 of 329
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2013, 6:03 am by Bruce E. Boyden
§ 105: “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government . . . . [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:06 am by Barry Sookman
—Feds Eye Social Media for Securities Shenanigans http://goo.gl/ExgYY Tech Summit 2013 Recap – Innovation in Outsourcing http://goo.gl/RpyyM Entitlement Matters http://goo.gl/ch1Zw Heartache and Sour Grapes on the Internet: A Lesson in Case Management http://goo.gl/P4M3n Beyond Knowledge and Consciousness – The Development of Liability for Misuse of Trade Secrets in the UK http://goo.gl/wudVt CIPO releases examination guidelines for medical use inventions http://goo.gl/cpXjW Knock… [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
  A recent article by NYU law professor Richard Pildes suggested that several recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court, most notably Citizens United, fit the “counter-majoritarian” thesis to a tee. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 11:55 am by admin
The insurance industry in our post-Citizens United World now gives unlimited amounts of money to judges and justices who publicly campaign promise to overturn decisions like McCormick v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 11:55 am by admin
The insurance industry in our post-Citizens United World now gives unlimited amounts of money to judges and justices who publicly campaign promise to overturn decisions like McCormick v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:58 am by Russ Bensing
In 1999, 98 people were executed in the United States. [read post]
20 May 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
Bagley on Tuesday, May 22, and United States v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:06 am by Colin Miller
Instead, according to the court, The United States Supreme Court has never held that rape-shield statutes do not represent a legitimate state interest, nor has it ever held that highly probative evidence will necessarily outweigh that interest. [read post]