Search for: "United States v. Mark Johnson" Results 181 - 200 of 591
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2015)The history of the United States has been, if nothing else, a history of tremendous battles over the definition and control of the societal structures that define and discipline its politics, law, and culture--its sense of self as a polity and community. [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Sussman of the defendant Sussman & Watkins (hereinafter together the Sussman defendants) to represent her in an action she commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging violations of 42 USC § 1983. [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Sussman of the defendant Sussman & Watkins (hereinafter together the Sussman defendants) to represent her in an action she commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging violations of 42 USC § 1983. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:50 am by John Mikhail
  Anticipating the theory later made famous by Justice Sutherland in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court ruled 6-2 yesterday that in a case involving deferred restitution, a defendant must file a notice of appeal from the restitution order in order to challenge it. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
Bacardi had sued Pernod stating that they were the rightful proprietor of the mark HAVANA CLUB. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
”  Golonka, 65 P.3d at 971-72 (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: False advertisement through third parties may constitute false marking, but facts must be pled with particularity: United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm by Amy Howe
Commentary on the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
 Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
Thus, to state a § 1983 claim, a plaintiff must allege two elements: (1) a deprivation of rights secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States, and (2) that `the deprivation was caused by a person acting under color of state law. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:23 pm
(Baumancites and quotation marks omitted).The only exception to Bauman’s state of incorporation/principal place of business rule is for “exceptional” situations similar to Perkins v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am by Kelly
Bausch & Lomb, Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Release of false marking claims applies to all products marked with patent mumbers: Simonian v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:00 am by Amy Howe
” At the Burnham Gorokov Blog, Ziran Zhang looks at the Court’s ruling in Johnson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:44 pm by Marissa Miller
The AP’s Mark Sherman (via the Traverse City (Mich.) [read post]