Search for: "United States v. May-Shaw" Results 181 - 200 of 317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
, (May 25, 2008).Frederick Mark Gedicks, Fundamentalism, Spirituality, and Church-State Relations in the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:41 pm by Erin Miller
  Further, in opposing the salience of racial proxies, post-9/11 activists may point to cases such as Shaw v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by John Elwood
”  United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 8:42 am
Kenneth continued the "Trademarks and Designs" overlap by giving an explanation of trade dress and product configuration in the United States. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 3:00 pm
Attorney for State: Arthur Thaddeus Perry, Indianapolis, IN. 9:45 AM - Filter Specialists, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Andrea Katz  In 1905, an Australian parliamentarian observing the United States used an unusual metaphor to describe our Constitution. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
The opposer contended that the mark SOCK IT UP was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, and therefore JY Instyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher
As the Court stated: “We have time and again forcefully rejected the notion that government actors may intentionally allocate preferences to those ‘who may have little in common with one another but the color of their skin” (quoting Shaw v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
India TV9 Telugu has been criticised for its coverage of women’s issues specifically that of senior police officer Sunitha Reddy’s divorce by academic Padmaja Shaw. [read post]