Search for: "United States v. New York Indians"
Results 181 - 200
of 621
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2019, 9:16 am
New York: Doubleday. 2017. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:16 am
New York: Doubleday. 2017. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:37 am
Uncounseled tribal court convictions as predicate offenses under United States v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:51 pm
Uncounseled tribal court convictions as predicate offenses under United States v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:51 pm
Uncounseled tribal court convictions as predicate offenses under United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Sevs. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 11:18 am
New York. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 2:38 am
Section 11 claims, will cost more to defend and settle: In 2018, the United States decided Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:43 am
Shell, which was heard in the federal district court of New York, was settled for $15.5 million. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:43 am
Shell, which was heard in the federal district court of New York, was settled for $15.5 million. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am
Wyoming, “an Indian treaty-rights case argued in the Supreme Court last Tuesday, revolves around a basic of federal Indian law: No promise to Indian people actually binds the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
United States, are also the top two cases generating the most interest so far this term. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:54 pm
Waxman replies that the principle of state sovereign immunity “is no different than Chief Justice Marshall’s recognition in McCulloch versus Maryland of the constitutional principle of intergovernmental immunity, [or] of the principle against commandeering that’s recognized by the court in Printz and New York versus United States. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the… [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
The change was sparked by a decision by a federal judge in New York who ruled that the key verse in the song was not protected under copyright for lack of originality. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 10:04 am
” This follows directly from New York v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
