Search for: "United States v. New York Telephone Co" Results 181 - 200 of 237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am by Karl Mihm
The case is currently at the New York Court of Appeals, the highest New York state court. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Litvin, New York, New York, for amicus National Basketball Association. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:22 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Southern District of New York 2007). [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Arkansas, Washington, Nebraska, and New York round out the top five states. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-16 in the District of New Mexico, Magistrate Judge Lorenzo F. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:57 pm by Michael Lowe
Under the FISA Amendment Act of 2008, reauthorized in 2012, warrantless wiretapping was approved by federal authorities, although this is currently being challenged and fought against via the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Clapper v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am by Marty Lederman
Cox:As provided by Title 28, Section 508(B) of the United States Code and Title 28, Section 0.132(A) of the Code of Federal Regulations, I have today assumed the duties of Acting Attorney General.In that capacity I am, as instructed by the President, discharging you, effective a [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Thompson-in federal court, asserting wage claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law and violations of New York Labor Law § 740. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:08 am
Charge filed by Vermont Telephone Co.; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(b)(3). [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Golden responds that compelling arbitration here would create an inherent conflict with the purposes and policies of the Bankruptcy Code, and for those reasons, the Court should not compel arbitration, and Firstmark's motion should be denied.JurisdictionThis Court has jurisdiction over this proceeding pursuant to Judiciary Code Sections 157(b)(1) and 1334(b), and the Standing Order of Reference dated August 28, 1986, as amended by the Order dated December 5, 2012, of the United… [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:53 pm by The Legal Blog
Taking support for its view from the decisions in (i) National Telephone Co. [read post]