Search for: "United States v. Nice"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2014, 7:03 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decisions regarding same-sex marriage in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 6:45 am
United States, which deals with the reach of the federal aggravated identity theft statute. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 2:55 am
If you’re nice, give them pillows. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:58 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:58 am
Just over one month ago, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Douglas Dynamics, LLC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 9:00 am
Customs examined the factors set out in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 5:17 pm
I'm not making any predictions about what will happen in Columbus, Ohio, on November 18, but here's a prediction I will make: The Michigan Supreme Court will not soon issue a Crawford opinion as absurd as the one issued this week (over a nice dissent) by a 4-3 majority of the Ohio Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance: The United States and Law Making--The States and the People; Popular referendums. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
United States, decided in 1926, and Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
Townsend and United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
It looks like USA v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 9:21 pm
I wrote a long time back about Stamp v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 12:00 pm
See United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:29 am
" See United States v Larson, __ F.3d. __, 2007 WL 2192256 (9th Cir. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 12:55 pm
He argues that the consecutive sentences: violate his rights under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments as explained in United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:08 pm
That's what today's oral argument in Weyhrauch v United States, No. 08-1196 sounded like to me and others as well. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:23 am
As she explains, there are good reasons to think the answer should be no---that the rationales for permitting undercover informants and consent searches don't mix.I want to add that the underlying constitutional law (per United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:43 am
He then cited to some of the landmark cases involving homosexuality such as Bowers v Hardwick [the 1986 case that upheld Georgia's criminalization of certain homosexual acts]; Lawrence v Texas [the 2003 decision overruling Bowers]; and of course, United States v Windsor [striking down as unconstitutional the federal Defense of Marriage Act which defined a marriage as solely between one man and one woman in the federal benefits context].Justice… [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 10:32 pm
On June 7, 2010, the United States Supreme Court released its decision in the case of Hamilton, Chapter 13 Trustee v. [read post]
