Search for: "United States v. Rands"
Results 181 - 200
of 278
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2013, 10:24 pm
Robart's landmark FRAND rate-setting determination in the Microsoft v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 2:49 pm
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington published his FRAND rate-setting decision in the Microsoft v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 10:19 am
Robart, the federal judge presiding over the Microsoft v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 11:20 pm
By contrast, Google's Motorola communicated prohibitive, out-of-this-world royalty demands to Apple and Microsoft, knowing that those would never accept to meet them, and was only interested in the leverage it would gain from obtaining and enforcing injunctions in the United States and Germany. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 7:36 am
As the country's attention turns to next week's oral arguments before the Supreme Court in the Prop 8 case and the ACLU's challenge to DOMA in United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 12:40 pm
Last summer both Apple and Google's Motorola appealed Judge Posner's June 2012 dismissal of a two-way Apple v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 12:55 am
Motorola ruling is highly influential, Judge James Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington -- with support from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit -- has become the pioneer and thought leader in the U.S. with respect to the adjudication of FRAND licensing terms by federal courts through the substantive and procedural decisions has has already made in the Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
Looking ahead to oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 2:04 pm
It is possible, l suppose, to ìmagine an extraordinary circumstance in which it would be necessary and appropriate under the Constitution and applicable laws of the United States for the President to authorize the military to use lethal force within the territory of the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 2:23 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Maryland v. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
By virtue of having followed the Microsoft v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:03 pm
Today I was in Mannheim for an IPCom v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 10:59 am
See also Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law § 114 (1986) ("Where fairly possible, a United States statute is to be construed so as not to conflict with international law or with an international agreement of the United States."). [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:12 pm
(When, in 2010, Rand Paul, the newly elected U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 12:24 pm
It is this dreadful feature of our political system, NOT required by the Constitution, that explains why it now counts as "success" if the United States doesn't go over a "cliff" or continues to pay its debts, as against genuinely confronting the serious problems that face us as a polity. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 9:19 am
But Motorola doesn't want this to happen in the United States, and especially not in a way that takes care of the FRAND licensing question on a worldwide basis.Motorola's Wisconsin motion wasn't sealed, but Apple's response, filed on Friday at Judge Crabb's request, is inaccessible to the public. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 4:42 pm
Steyn quoted and linked to a post by Rand Simberg at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, the rhetorical thrust of which was that Penn State clearing Mr. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am
http://bit.ly/QeYSVx (Michael Schmidt) Proper Wildcard Searching: Why You Should Give a Dam* – http://bit.ly/Pjc34V (Doug Austin) Radically Reinvent The Review Process - http://bit.ly/Q2x6LK (George Kiersted) Rambus ‘Shred Days’ Ruled Spoliation, $397M Judgment Reduced - http://bit.ly/Pn446U (Jan Wolfe) Reasonable Particularity And Social Network eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/P0Kqxr (IT-Lex) State Judge Imposes $300K… [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 5:14 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
