Search for: "United States v. Reveles"
Results 181 - 200
of 707
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Although Schaeffer was vehemently anti-Catholic, he shared on important meta-view with some Catholics, which is the desirability of an "integral" connection between church and state, for the simple reason that it is only God's sovereignty that in fact legitimizes the State, and, therefore, it is the duty of the state to adhere to Divine Command. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:05 am
” At The Daily Beast, Ronald Goldfarb argues that the 1967 case United States v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 1:01 pm
Another decision is Public Citizen v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm
On 8 March 2019, interim judgment was handed down in the apparently unremarkable case of Justyna Zeromska-Smith v United Lincolnshire Hospital Trust [2019] EWHC 552(QB). [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:18 am
Drone Strikes in Somalia (Somali plaintiff v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:16 am
They lay out concerns about current members of the White House staff in addition to Kushner, including questions about whether Trump’s second national security adviser, John Bolton, revealed on his security clearance application his work with Maria Butina (who pleaded guilty in December 2018 to conspiring with senior Russian official Alexander Torshin to infiltrate the conservative movement in the United States as an agent of the Russian government). [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 2:23 pm
The complaint in Martin v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 3:12 pm
It was a year in which careers and states were upended by reason of revelation and communication. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 6:29 am
It was the year of great social transformation spurred by revelations--of sexual improprieties, and of policing and race in the United States. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 12:15 pm
It was the year of great social transformation spurred by revelations--of sexual improprieties, and of policing and race in the United States. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm
Represent or supervise the representation of the United States Government in the Supreme Court of the United States and all other courts, foreign and domestic, in which the United States is a party or has an interest as may be deemed appropriate. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
As the US Supreme Court recognized in Miranda v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:15 am
The court emphasized that what the administration sought to do was unprecedented, writing, “We know of no instance — in the history of the United States — in which the government has forcibly transferred an American citizen from one foreign country to another. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Four years later, in November 2017, the case was finally heard by a chamber of the ECHR alongside two related cases that also brought allegations under Article 8: the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (2014) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (2015). [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 10:36 am
Supreme Court in the Morrison v. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
"I've talked repeatedly in this hearing about how technology will be one of the huge issues with the Fourth Amendment going forward," said Kavanaugh, who serves on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Volpe, 401 US 402, 415 (1971) (decision of the Secretary of Transportation comes with a “presumption of regularity” concerning “the official acts of public officers and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties”), and United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Volpe, 401 US 402, 415 (1971) (decision of the Secretary of Transportation comes with a “presumption of regularity” concerning “the official acts of public officers and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties”), and United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:58 am
One of the most notable ambiguities in Kavanaugh's record is the question of what he really thinks about the validity of the United States v. [read post]
