Search for: "United States v. Scott & Williams" Results 181 - 200 of 521
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am by Kevin Kaufman
Increasingly, however, the state is struggling. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am by Victoria Clark
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman questioned whether Mueller is an “Officer” of the United States or an “Employee” of the United States in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lucia v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am by msatta
Kentucky, the Supreme Court ruled that failure of a defense attorney to inform a client that a collateral consequence of their felony plea could lead to the client’s (in this case, a forty-year permanent resident in the United States) deportation constituted deficient performance by the attorney.[8] Two years later, in Missouri v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am by Amy Howe
” The article also noted that, when the late Justice William Brennan was asked about potential conflict between his Catholic faith and his duties as a justice, he responded that he would be governed by “the oath I took to support the Constitution and laws of the United States”; Barrett and Garvey observed that they did not “defend this position as the proper response for a Catholic judge to take with respect to abortion or the death penalty. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
” Heather Long for the Washington Post reports that Collins “said Sunday she would not vote for any judge who wanted to end access to abortion in the United States by overturning Roe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:25 am by Bobby Chen
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, addressed states’ authority to regulate LGBT issues; his opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Rulings IPSO has published a single resolution statement and series of rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 03262-18 Stein v The Herald, resolved by IPSO mediation 01724-18 Nightingale v Mail Online, no breach of the IPSO code 01108-18 Mike Ashley and Sports Direct v The Times, breach of provision 1 (Accuracy) 01066-18 Gabriel v The Sun, no breach of the IPSO code 01065-18 Gabriel v Daily Star, no breach of the IPSO code 01064-18… [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:24 pm by Jon Levitan
United States</em> appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
At the Mississippi Business Journal, Ben Williams maintains that “[r]egardless of what Congress and the States do with sports gaming” after the court’s ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court held on Monday that a decision not to grant a proportional sentence reduction does not require a detailed written explanation. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 3:01 pm by scottgaille
This is a guest blog authored by William Brumfield, an Associate at GAILLE PLLC. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
For Constitution Daily, Scott Bomboy reports that in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” At Constitution Daily, Scott Bomboy highlights Janus v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 8:37 am by Sarah Grant
Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the intermediate military appellate court responsible for reviewing military commission proceedings, announced that it currently lacks a quorum to decide contested motions in United States v. [read post]