Search for: "United States v. Union Gas Co."
Results 181 - 193
of 193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
The Board also adopted the judges' finding that a Gissel bargaining order was necessary and warranted under NLRB v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 11:21 am
Area Trade Bindery Co. (31-CA-26970, 27500; 352 NLRB No. 29) Burbank, CA Feb. 29, 2008. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
State,272 Ga. 540 (1) (533 SE2d 60) (2000); State of Ga. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:15 am
City of Oklahoma, 816 F.2d 539, 540-41 (10th Cir. 1987), alleging a right of privacy under the Florida state constitution and the United States Constitution; Brashear v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
: Industries Ltd v Dynamic Supply Pty Ltd: (IP Down Under)BrazilIFPI raids hundreds of internet cafes: 600 cops, one arrest: (Ars Technica)CanadaInterlocutory injunctions in trade mark cases: a difficult test to meet: CMAC Mortgages v Canadian Mortgage Expert Centre and CanadaHyundai Autov Cross Canada Auto Body Supply: (Canadian Trademark Blog), (coverage of Hyundia - IPblog), Privacy Coalition warns on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Wikinomics on… [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
BE&K Construction Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 3:00 pm
Southern California Gas Co. (9th Cir. 2000) 219 F.3d 1063, where the overtime premium was determined by interpreting a CBA. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
It is very rarely permitted, since the American system of justice is premised upon an open system in which, whenever one side wants to communicate with the Court, it has to give prior notice to the other side, so that they too will have an opportunity to be heard.).The "ex parte" order would give the RIAA permission to take "immediate discovery" -- before the defendants have been served or given notice -- which authorizes the issuance of subpoenas to the ISP's asking for the… [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
" Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co., 194 NLRB 569, 470 (1971), et al. [read post]
